MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION
now as MAINLY ACCEPTED DECEPTION:
[this material was sent out 1-19-07: link at bottom found today]
There are too many potential links to alert you to, but the above should hit the mark. The point is do we intend to move forward or are we going back? Nuclear Proliferation seems the height of counter productivity in the so called new world since 9-11. It is not just MAD but INSANE and that stands for nothing, but where we are headed. That may be the real point of their madness. Hit and Run, somebody wins but what?
But I high-lite more of my own links and my own model, which is not just the fanciful reconstruction of ancient thinkers but what has always been the project for debate and what power too naturally denies.
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2007/01/just-thought_17.html
"Just a thought" can be punctuated several ways, but "Just" is more, than just assuming that things are "old" or "new". Just is the purpose of our constitution, the only thing the president is sworn to defend. "Just" is the project our founding fathers settled on in it's words and even the preamble gets lost in the difference between needs and wants.
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2007/01/running-list-and-reference-links.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2007/01/hit-and-run-gang.html
These links bookend the long and short of it, and hopefully will be of help, but the point I will end on is how can we expect that a "War on Terrorism" will be at all successful if offense is not just the last resort, but their only plan to end it, while avoiding the law is their first and last concern?
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query MAD. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query MAD. Sort by date Show all posts
Monday, January 29, 2007
Tuesday, October 04, 2011
What, Me Worry?
No, I am not talking MAD[!].
I am talking math.
And so is Ronald Reagan!
Like the "golden rule" the "Buffet Rule" (not to mention American Exceptionalism) has two connotations.
[Speaking of Mad, here is a slippery slope. A combination of the fallacy of the false dilemma and the boogie man, not to mention divide to conquer. In the last dichotomy, it is the egalitarian from the rest of our founding principles and perspectives*.]
* I preemptively insert as a counter-balance: To be read and transmobilized later. Or should I say, trance figured. But it depends(see post asterisks) on what your definitions of I T R.
[10-5-11 Maybe I should.]
[Duoh!]
[10-6-11 Speaking of trans something.]
Friday, August 06, 2004
NEXUS REVIEW (Re-posted)
Wednesday, February 12, 2003
NEXUS REVIEW
It seems on reading the Bin Laden communiqué, that it is a not so funny parody of a typical Madison Avenue ad campaign or Bush speech. Regardless of it being faked or supporting anyone in particular (the people or their government) it’s utility is proven as a nexus for the Bush administration. It is too bad that we don’t have a nexus of words and actions rather than people.
The flip-flop that Secretary of State Powell has done (Saddam /Bin Laden nexus) is demonstrative of the lack of nexus in the administration between principles and words, words and actions, and principles and actions. It is easy to see how America is not gaining friends or influencing people. Where is the nexus uniting not dividing, trusting the nexus of the people and the government, and being the nexus of the legal and ones conscience?
This is a track record in Bush statements that lacks nexus, so why should any nexus they see matter? And how could we expect them to see the nexus between preemptive actions and offensive actions, being less of a nexus than offensive and defensive? Nor how could we not expect our adversaries to see a nexus between their preemptive alternatives and defense? It seems that we are on the road from MAD* to MAO (Mutually Assured Offenses).
* UPDATE:
MAD (Officially a defense policy of Mutually Assured Destruction) or what Bush seemed to be just to bluff. Which I thought was a good strategy if it was a bluff, but unfortunately it was not a bluff in more ways than one.
NEXUS REVIEW
It seems on reading the Bin Laden communiqué, that it is a not so funny parody of a typical Madison Avenue ad campaign or Bush speech. Regardless of it being faked or supporting anyone in particular (the people or their government) it’s utility is proven as a nexus for the Bush administration. It is too bad that we don’t have a nexus of words and actions rather than people.
The flip-flop that Secretary of State Powell has done (Saddam /Bin Laden nexus) is demonstrative of the lack of nexus in the administration between principles and words, words and actions, and principles and actions. It is easy to see how America is not gaining friends or influencing people. Where is the nexus uniting not dividing, trusting the nexus of the people and the government, and being the nexus of the legal and ones conscience?
This is a track record in Bush statements that lacks nexus, so why should any nexus they see matter? And how could we expect them to see the nexus between preemptive actions and offensive actions, being less of a nexus than offensive and defensive? Nor how could we not expect our adversaries to see a nexus between their preemptive alternatives and defense? It seems that we are on the road from MAD* to MAO (Mutually Assured Offenses).
* UPDATE:
MAD (Officially a defense policy of Mutually Assured Destruction) or what Bush seemed to be just to bluff. Which I thought was a good strategy if it was a bluff, but unfortunately it was not a bluff in more ways than one.
Sunday, October 02, 2011
Retro-Gate
Iran-Contra, WMD, October No-Surprise.
Not to preemptively prophet[!]
Not to bring back the draft,
but here are some posts held in draft.
Update: Muffin Gate: Miff In Gate
Pulled from draft today!
[Oops, a bit redundant]
Great Ledership
It's Mad[!]
[!] = sarcasm / spelling as intended = [sp!]
Close enough for journal work?
[10-3-11 Just to be clear, I believe in nuance and the law, but as different fields. What I can't say is that I am clearly satire, but the field might be mis-ledership***. But not to coin a new field, here are some other* perspectives, not to say they are the same field. (two video, two scroll overs)
*after the break: Stewart on NRA / teaching** to the test? NOT!]
** speaking of headings*** or retro
*** footnote to clarify later:
moral economics(INET/Robert Reich)& even later
BTW: sub-heading(Just to be clear...) I did not mean to wind-up a G'Ribble, but you can't judge a target by its aim, fear-mongers need a boogie-man. Aims are directions not bulls-eyes.
Definition: G'Ribble- grand ribbing and riddle
[*4] Ratigan and Perugia: processes
Not to preemptively prophet[!]
Not to bring back the draft,
but here are some posts held in draft.
Update: Muffin Gate: Miff In Gate
Pulled from draft today!
[Oops, a bit redundant]
Great Ledership
It's Mad[!]
[!] = sarcasm / spelling as intended = [sp!]
Close enough for journal work?
[10-3-11 Just to be clear, I believe in nuance and the law, but as different fields. What I can't say is that I am clearly satire, but the field might be mis-ledership***. But not to coin a new field, here are some other* perspectives, not to say they are the same field. (two video, two scroll overs)
*after the break: Stewart on NRA / teaching** to the test? NOT!]
** speaking of headings*** or retro
*** footnote to clarify later:
moral economics(INET/Robert Reich)& even later
BTW: sub-heading(Just to be clear...) I did not mean to wind-up a G'Ribble, but you can't judge a target by its aim, fear-mongers need a boogie-man. Aims are directions not bulls-eyes.
Definition: G'Ribble- grand ribbing and riddle
[*4] Ratigan and Perugia: processes
Thursday, September 25, 2014
Friday, January 11, 2013
No Drama
Obama...
better than all Bama OdeRama[!]or the Rumsfeld School of Infotainment(2) or Mad Ave.
That sure spins the tale(1) on the dawn key (3) !
(1) (b.s.) "English+only"
(2) Flap a Chino Rino? Or Up Swift Creak?
(3) not to be facetious but it seemed a battle of the "Fair and Balanced"('n aside of Cheney) with Scarborough burnishing his Rx and not liking his own medicine.
(verse us?) Re:Creaking?
SPEAKing of Re: I have a missing link to dig up. But MEANwhile... more on spare the Rod ne Danger Fields and Share N Angles..Or Fries with that.
Monday, September 19, 2011
Nailed It! T-point Oh!
Tangent or Tetrahedron:
Not T-Rx or Too point Oh, but my segue from Jon Stewart and the T-Party to the Peas** Party, or the adult in the White House, also is symbolized in the 3* part response that is just the beginning of the Iron Chef.
*by 3, I mean, the joint session, the follow up and the long term, as represented in presentations of the Obama plan
** or Broccoli[!]
[Another T: Tangent or Tax issue see ** there ]
[BTW: It's MAD, I mean "math", but it is this simple. From T-boned to L-boned(an accidental vehicle metaphor) the Lincoln Labor / Capital reference is pertinent in a "fair and balanced" tax structure -- i.e. treat capital gains as income.]
[Not to make light of food or metaphors, but there may be something to the Cain and able of 9-9-9. The number may not be important or that it is the flip-flop of 6-6-6. but that there is nothing wrong with a flat tax, if there are flat, and sufficient but limited deductions and exemptions, as well as a sufficient safety net. Note no mention of capital gains which I read as considered income.]
Not T-Rx or Too point Oh, but my segue from Jon Stewart and the T-Party to the Peas** Party, or the adult in the White House, also is symbolized in the 3* part response that is just the beginning of the Iron Chef.
*by 3, I mean, the joint session, the follow up and the long term, as represented in presentations of the Obama plan
** or Broccoli[!]
[Another T: Tangent or Tax issue see ** there ]
[BTW: It's MAD, I mean "math", but it is this simple. From T-boned to L-boned(an accidental vehicle metaphor) the Lincoln Labor / Capital reference is pertinent in a "fair and balanced" tax structure -- i.e. treat capital gains as income.]
[Not to make light of food or metaphors, but there may be something to the Cain and able of 9-9-9. The number may not be important or that it is the flip-flop of 6-6-6. but that there is nothing wrong with a flat tax, if there are flat, and sufficient but limited deductions and exemptions, as well as a sufficient safety net. Note no mention of capital gains which I read as considered income.]
Monday, November 14, 2011
Where everyone needs to read...
local that is, the Seattle Post Intelligencer and Joel Connelly**.
But* not so fast.
* related facebook comments: Since the original poster had little context, I will only post my replies here.
< Here is to Herman Cain: "Stupid people are ruining America." Then he attracks them like a moth to a flame. The irony is that corporate persons already suffer from a sort of cultural innoculation. Or is it "the hash they have made" or "in...difference" to reality". OWS, may not only be a breeding ground for what might "thin out the herd", but of "super" bugs that may just be the new yogurt or intenstinal fortitude that bugs king context. Flavor this economically pathological.>
< @K.O. Kudos for replying in mixed metaphor. Nice shuffle of the birds and the bees, you may have picked up on the "social Darwinism". But I am not sure we agree who the dealer is, or rather who counts, and who are the cards. Let alone who lives on borrowed money.>
< @K.O. BTW: I do believe you missed a "dis" or something, as V.H. pointed out. As in "How dare you dis Scott..." etc. And you are correct that Scott was neutral in the original posting, but if "context is king" then M.J. was not the royal pain. The original was a mere "'reporting", but that does not mean it was not leaning on some con text, as reactions have shown.>
Not so G(AB)W. C-fields.
[anachrogate? And more. Also KUOW with Mayor McGinn.]
** Original intent: local ledership and rail issues(see *). Bit*** of a stretch? Not really.
*** Rachel Maddow: debunktion junction. That as for a junction: Europe is not U.S when it comes to austerity, infrastructure or other investments.
[11-15-11: OWS/Reporting. Free Speech and Porta Pottys.]
[MSNBC: Rachel MadDow [!][and Aye of Newt?]
[Articulate.
But* not so fast.
* related facebook comments: Since the original poster had little context, I will only post my replies here.
< Here is to Herman Cain: "Stupid people are ruining America." Then he attracks them like a moth to a flame. The irony is that corporate persons already suffer from a sort of cultural innoculation. Or is it "the hash they have made" or "in...difference" to reality". OWS, may not only be a breeding ground for what might "thin out the herd", but of "super" bugs that may just be the new yogurt or intenstinal fortitude that bugs king context. Flavor this economically pathological.>
< @K.O. Kudos for replying in mixed metaphor. Nice shuffle of the birds and the bees, you may have picked up on the "social Darwinism". But I am not sure we agree who the dealer is, or rather who counts, and who are the cards. Let alone who lives on borrowed money.>
< @K.O. BTW: I do believe you missed a "dis" or something, as V.H. pointed out. As in "How dare you dis Scott..." etc. And you are correct that Scott was neutral in the original posting, but if "context is king" then M.J. was not the royal pain. The original was a mere "'reporting", but that does not mean it was not leaning on some con text, as reactions have shown.>
Not so G(AB)W. C-fields.
[anachrogate? And more. Also KUOW with Mayor McGinn.]
** Original intent: local ledership and rail issues(see *). Bit*** of a stretch? Not really.
*** Rachel Maddow: debunktion junction. That as for a junction: Europe is not U.S when it comes to austerity, infrastructure or other investments.
[11-15-11: OWS/Reporting. Free Speech and Porta Pottys.]
[MSNBC: Rachel MadDow [!][and Aye of Newt?]
[Articulate.
Monday, May 03, 2010
FAUX CULTIAN?
Pop Culture [*] and big Do Do!
[Source threads: [A], [B].
[I should note that I have not even caught Mad Men or The Wire but they might be following us and I allude to the deeper threads, which just might hinge on the word reconstruction as much as deconstruction.]
[Hint: "PC" is a Beckian tangent(wisecrack or side crack), while "Do Do" is a mess age we are in and must "read" as "well/to do". P.S. not pronounced "doh, doh" but that is another tangent or non-dough dew.]
[P.S.2.0 my "original intent" was to avoid "a ribble", but it could be unavoidable without a revamping of Keynesian economics or at least an imparting of Try-Go-No Metrics.]
* Update 5-6-10 P.C. Explained see Hint link added under "Beckian".
[Source threads: [A], [B].
[I should note that I have not even caught Mad Men or The Wire but they might be following us and I allude to the deeper threads, which just might hinge on the word reconstruction as much as deconstruction.]
[Hint: "PC" is a Beckian tangent(wisecrack or side crack), while "Do Do" is a mess age we are in and must "read" as "well/to do". P.S. not pronounced "doh, doh" but that is another tangent or non-dough dew.]
[P.S.2.0 my "original intent" was to avoid "a ribble", but it could be unavoidable without a revamping of Keynesian economics or at least an imparting of Try-Go-No Metrics.]
* Update 5-6-10 P.C. Explained see Hint link added under "Beckian".
Monday, September 19, 2011
Civil Disobedience...
I am not calling for it, but googled it, and found no mention of the current case, not that it might be called something else.
My one and only point(well...2 or three)is(R) that 1) those that partake actually have a line to cross, 2) they have consequences for crossing any lines, and 3) that government is also bound by such clarity.
Speaking of whatchamacallit...what is the flip flop of Civil Disobedience? Criminal Pathology(I mean following)?
[9-20-11 Update: Note Pathology Pun ]
[Not to mention ge oh me trick segue. BTW: It is a vision thing. No Burning Bush, but... "bad faith" v. good math Speaking of Highways: I originally mis-heard the president. I thought he said "It's MAD! Which is Bane or...see di-mentionism.]
My one and only point(well...2 or three)is(R) that 1) those that partake actually have a line to cross, 2) they have consequences for crossing any lines, and 3) that government is also bound by such clarity.
Speaking of whatchamacallit...what is the flip flop of Civil Disobedience? Criminal Pathology(I mean following)?
[9-20-11 Update: Note Pathology Pun ]
[Not to mention ge oh me trick segue. BTW: It is a vision thing. No Burning Bush, but... "bad faith" v. good math Speaking of Highways: I originally mis-heard the president. I thought he said "It's MAD! Which is Bane or...see di-mentionism.]
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
HIT AND RUN (QCON)
"HIT AND RUN" is my term for the Righty Republicans. Righty Republican is another running with terms. This blog has been about Running with Rhetoric. Rhetoric, like politics or the law, is not good or bad, but that is another story.
QCON is an acronym, for Quick Comment On the News. It also runs in line with this post. It suffices to stand for Questioning Cons, and that is the link to the Hit and Run. The Hit and Run refers to the crowd, usually the Righty Republicans who would bash the so-called "Liberal" media or press" while running from the questions. Tommy Thompson recently did an amazing "hit and run" on the abortion issue.
Now in these cases of representing such an exchange it may make more sense to skip from the transcript. A closer look may ruin my thesis. But the portion I did hear, had him for making abortion illegal, but sending people to jail was a "liberal" thing. By Jove I believe I did it. A one liner.
But on another track, "liberals" are about running the government, not running from responsibility for their actions or questions, while Righty Republicans are about bashing and running for it.
Search: QCON, Hit and Run
and bonus search: MAD
QCON is an acronym, for Quick Comment On the News. It also runs in line with this post. It suffices to stand for Questioning Cons, and that is the link to the Hit and Run. The Hit and Run refers to the crowd, usually the Righty Republicans who would bash the so-called "Liberal" media or press" while running from the questions. Tommy Thompson recently did an amazing "hit and run" on the abortion issue.
Now in these cases of representing such an exchange it may make more sense to skip from the transcript. A closer look may ruin my thesis. But the portion I did hear, had him for making abortion illegal, but sending people to jail was a "liberal" thing. By Jove I believe I did it. A one liner.
But on another track, "liberals" are about running the government, not running from responsibility for their actions or questions, while Righty Republicans are about bashing and running for it.
Search: QCON, Hit and Run
and bonus search: MAD
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Thumbs/GOP and OWS
Thumbs:Still to insert Para-model links.
*
GOP:Marco Rubio: still going
and OWS:I mean,I HEART_JOBS!
Occupy Wall Street
UPDATE: BY Marc Ash(A witness to the violence in Oakland)
CHART WARS
and IMAGES
* not exactly the right hand
TRY POD:
Actually it might be hazardous to click on Newton's Fourth Law of Motion under uncyclopedia. But it states: "When people get mad, they move faster." But that is apparently from a Donald World.(Hence I might not try to insert it.) No more buts, but you just may get the triangle, not that I pod. (Hint: F=ma not freedom + the press is not it.) {and I haven't even touched the Current or Fig Newton.)
Speaking of Apples and Oranges, Cherries* and UN-ions[!]
*No Will I Am, but a pit.(And Beef, Cheese & Sausage Buffet or TaleGates**.)
(No Jobs, but Tale of Two Gates?)
** speaking of sports or road rage?
*GOP:Marco Rubio: still going
and OWS:I mean,I HEART_JOBS!
Occupy Wall Street
UPDATE: BY Marc Ash(A witness to the violence in Oakland)
CHART WARS
and IMAGES
* not exactly the right hand
TRY POD:
Actually it might be hazardous to click on Newton's Fourth Law of Motion under uncyclopedia. But it states: "When people get mad, they move faster." But that is apparently from a Donald World.(Hence I might not try to insert it.) No more buts, but you just may get the triangle, not that I pod. (Hint: F=ma not freedom + the press is not it.) {and I haven't even touched the Current or Fig Newton.)
Speaking of Apples and Oranges, Cherries* and UN-ions[!]
*No Will I Am, but a pit.(And Beef, Cheese & Sausage Buffet or TaleGates**.)
(No Jobs, but Tale of Two Gates?)
** speaking of sports or road rage?
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Preemptive Happy New Year!
We Got Ed
Nor Man Gold Man
Rachell Mad*dow
Keith Olbermann
Thom Hartmann
Ron Reagan
Not the least of the lesser lights,**
but in particular order,
Pardon me not the least, Chris Matthews.
Links to be added later, might be. Or maybe.
[Locker Room Snap, Within Limits, Rather Miffication, or Retrogressing in reserve.]
** 12-31-09 upper links and asterisk added: an awkward way of saying I was probably forgetting some
* 1-2-10 slipped in 2nd link and worse (excuse the asteriskal anachronism: not/anachronistic )
Nor Man Gold Man
Rachell Mad*dow
Keith Olbermann
Thom Hartmann
Ron Reagan
Not the least of the lesser lights,**
but in particular order,
Pardon me not the least, Chris Matthews.
Links to be added later, might be. Or maybe.
[Locker Room Snap, Within Limits, Rather Miffication, or Retrogressing in reserve.]
** 12-31-09 upper links and asterisk added: an awkward way of saying I was probably forgetting some
* 1-2-10 slipped in 2nd link and worse (excuse the asteriskal anachronism: not/anachronistic )
Monday, March 30, 2015
New Clear
Much ado about nature?
Chicken, Egg or New Clear? A new meaning for the acronym MAD! Aside from the feeling one gets when reading such things, it could be Mutually Assured Deterioration. It seems like the N'th time's the charm. Maybe there is a call for this type of clarity so we can be reminded of our own type of regime change, and how change period is a slippery slope up, not the theory that dominoes suggest by being exceptions to the rulers.
Re:clear
Nature~ the course of changing laws.
Old Clear?
Un-Clear !
3-31-15 Update!
4-1-15 Update.
Chicken, Egg or New Clear? A new meaning for the acronym MAD! Aside from the feeling one gets when reading such things, it could be Mutually Assured Deterioration. It seems like the N'th time's the charm. Maybe there is a call for this type of clarity so we can be reminded of our own type of regime change, and how change period is a slippery slope up, not the theory that dominoes suggest by being exceptions to the rulers.
Re:clear
Nature~ the course of changing laws.
Old Clear?
Un-Clear !
3-31-15 Update!
4-1-15 Update.
Sunday, October 09, 2011
Network Paradox-
ymoron.
AlanGrayson nails it.
Well, not exactly.
One party "Occupies Wall Street[!]"(OWS), the other is "Fair and Balanced".
Mad as HBO and not going to take it?
[My "parodoxymoron" is not aimed at a person, but the perspectivism of parties, and anti-relativism. My use refers to my one liner of contrast. My apologies to the WWW, I thought I coined something.]
AlanGrayson nails it.
Well, not exactly.
One party "Occupies Wall Street[!]"(OWS), the other is "Fair and Balanced".
Mad as HBO and not going to take it?
[My "parodoxymoron" is not aimed at a person, but the perspectivism of parties, and anti-relativism. My use refers to my one liner of contrast. My apologies to the WWW, I thought I coined something.]
Friday, December 04, 2009
Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.
you google*
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)
[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]
Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.
footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]
[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.
[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]
1-9-14 Kant we all ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches? No. Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics? Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant. Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics. Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee. (G'Ribble Label?)
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)
[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]
It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. [**]
Steven Clemons: On Olbermann
Palin and the Pashtun and the Dickens it is.
Lawrence Wilkerson: on ibid. [6-22-12 Link Corrected]
A Christmas Carol meets A Wonderful Life.
Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.
footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]
[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.
[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]
1-9-14 Kant we all ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches? No. Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics? Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant. Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics. Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee. (G'Ribble Label?)
Saturday, October 01, 2011
It's MAD[!]
To be clear, that is actually what I heard, the day the President put on his game face last week. To be clear, it was not his solutions that are Mutually Assured Destruction, but the "class warfare"(Math) that has been taking place for 30 years or more.
From draft as-is 10-2-11
From draft as-is 10-2-11
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Recess War!
While war with Iran is hopefully on a far back burner, Bush has turned up the heat at home on the domestic diplomatic front by appointing Sam Fox, for "voluntary services" as ambassador to Belgium.
My last post, $hotgun $abbatical refers to a focusing of my scattered thoughts and a breather to focus on more local realities. I even noted it would be hard to hold to, but it seemed appropriate to note some recessed topics.
Here are more links, which I have not filtered, meaning taken more than a glance at:
Since the above quote raised Senator Dodd, in my mind, Edwards should be noted as doing well in my mind. Not as the Right would say "out of sympathy", well actually Edwards said that(they flip-flopped that), which is the point, it is about how he dealt with the media and and now his Efront operations. Not just the money, but the media.
Also sideshow smackdowns are good for the process if they steer debate or even take others from the need to distract. Kerry, The Gingrich Washington Post
IRAN POSTS:
Not the most recent Hersh post: The New Yorker
Who's paranoid and who's out to get whom? SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS
LATE RADAR
War Games: Who will blink, and will it matter? Atlanta Free Press
Is compromise something in anyones deck of cards? Or
can a mad man blink or who should he blink to? Deepjournal
Flip-Flop of the War on Terror. Huffington Post
A cautious horror, the "Samson Option". TPM CAFE
Not exactly beach reading material...
Oh, somewhere up in these links may be the concept that Pakistan has an interesting zone where who knows what is going on. Outsourcing terror or Iran Contra anyone?
Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), another member of the Foreign Relations Committee -- one of three '08 presidential contenders on the panel -- made it clear the White House declared war through its recess appointment.
My last post, $hotgun $abbatical refers to a focusing of my scattered thoughts and a breather to focus on more local realities. I even noted it would be hard to hold to, but it seemed appropriate to note some recessed topics.
Here are more links, which I have not filtered, meaning taken more than a glance at:
Since the above quote raised Senator Dodd, in my mind, Edwards should be noted as doing well in my mind. Not as the Right would say "out of sympathy", well actually Edwards said that(they flip-flopped that), which is the point, it is about how he dealt with the media and and now his Efront operations. Not just the money, but the media.
Also sideshow smackdowns are good for the process if they steer debate or even take others from the need to distract. Kerry, The Gingrich Washington Post
IRAN POSTS:
Not the most recent Hersh post: The New Yorker
Who's paranoid and who's out to get whom? SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS
LATE RADAR
War Games: Who will blink, and will it matter? Atlanta Free Press
Is compromise something in anyones deck of cards? Or
can a mad man blink or who should he blink to? Deepjournal
Flip-Flop of the War on Terror. Huffington Post
A cautious horror, the "Samson Option". TPM CAFE
Not exactly beach reading material...
Oh, somewhere up in these links may be the concept that Pakistan has an interesting zone where who knows what is going on. Outsourcing terror or Iran Contra anyone?
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
We're as mad as Heck and...
Friday, May 19, 2006
Bush the United
Bush the Unitary*
The founding fathers are blue, or at least purple, meaning they are rolling over in their graves with sadness if not hopping mad. This image began as an intent to remedially read the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution by highlighting it in color for those that need help standing up for the principles contained in them. America should really be red as in the color of anger that the Republicans accuse Democrats of being full of. Doubly red for the embarrassment that we are exporting "so called Democracy" while undermining it at home.
A little color in their cheeks should be left over for the "so called Liberal Media" which if it were really so liberal, would be shouting from the roof tops or at least on all networks about a law suit brought by a few in Congress suing Bush for violating the Constitution by signing SB 1932 which that did not pass through the House. Not to mention the 750 laws that Bush has signed but noted he will not follow. OK...That is my slight exaggeration. The "he will not follow" not the number 750 necessarily (one is enough). These should be under the heading of Bush Pre-Justice, not to mention Pre-Legislate and Pre-Administration, and never mind chain of command. READ THIS:
Article II: Section 2. paragraphs 2 and 3
He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law : but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone***, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.
The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.
My bold and italics added instead of the color code that should insight(i).
It should be noted how much emphasis there is on the senate and the law regarding the powers of the executive. Rememeber how "philosophy" was so important in his selections for appointment, not to mention** loyalty.
* link added after the first two paragraphs posted here.
(i) = intentionally construed.
** link added last and is noted as not necessarily balanced and not fully read by myself but from what I did read, had already selected here the pertinent sections that refute.
*** It may be important to explain here (it seems) that these executive powers are only vested by law, by the senate, to whom they alone choose.
The founding fathers are blue, or at least purple, meaning they are rolling over in their graves with sadness if not hopping mad. This image began as an intent to remedially read the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution by highlighting it in color for those that need help standing up for the principles contained in them. America should really be red as in the color of anger that the Republicans accuse Democrats of being full of. Doubly red for the embarrassment that we are exporting "so called Democracy" while undermining it at home.
A little color in their cheeks should be left over for the "so called Liberal Media" which if it were really so liberal, would be shouting from the roof tops or at least on all networks about a law suit brought by a few in Congress suing Bush for violating the Constitution by signing SB 1932 which that did not pass through the House. Not to mention the 750 laws that Bush has signed but noted he will not follow. OK...That is my slight exaggeration. The "he will not follow" not the number 750 necessarily (one is enough). These should be under the heading of Bush Pre-Justice, not to mention Pre-Legislate and Pre-Administration, and never mind chain of command. READ THIS:
Article II: Section 2. paragraphs 2 and 3
He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law : but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone***, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.
The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.
My bold and italics added instead of the color code that should insight(i).
It should be noted how much emphasis there is on the senate and the law regarding the powers of the executive. Rememeber how "philosophy" was so important in his selections for appointment, not to mention** loyalty.
* link added after the first two paragraphs posted here.
(i) = intentionally construed.
** link added last and is noted as not necessarily balanced and not fully read by myself but from what I did read, had already selected here the pertinent sections that refute.
*** It may be important to explain here (it seems) that these executive powers are only vested by law, by the senate, to whom they alone choose.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)